the3rdlegend
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 533
Message Number 1Date Posted: 10 May 2005, 11:08:02 PM Just to be rude, I think they should take a 777, put bigger wings on with about 6 more engines, put 30mm vulcans all over it, and oh yeah stuff it with bombs or nukes. Just something really rediculas to make everybody else go 'what the hell'.
trerxt67
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 534
Message Number 2Date Posted: 11 May 2005, 9:06:16 AM Jesus! I hope they don´t transform the doble-decker Airbus A380 into a masive
aerial base loaded with full terrain equipment, a vast load of nukes, ´full extras´ assault teams (about 500 persons), 10 heavy duty tanks, and advaced command offices inside capable to manage an entire government via GPS, adding a luxurious 5 star hotel inside for the employees, and use 10 of those 777 as nuclear bombers! jaj, just to make every nation go 'Are these guys out of their mind?'
the3rdlegend
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 535
Message Number 3Date Posted: 12 May 2005, 1:08:47 PM Why that's a GRAND IDEA, I also think they should make aircraft carriers FLY!
the3rdlegend
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 536
Message Number 4Date Posted: 12 May 2005, 1:13:44 PM -and if it gets shot down we can call it a state or province...
trerxt67
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 541
Message Number 5Date Posted: 16 May 2005, 11:28:11 AM The carriers of these Giant &*#%&*#%, would be the popular 'Starwars´' Star Destroyers, or something like the Lord Vader´s Command Ship, don´t you think?
lilred36781
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 547
Message Number 6Date Posted: 23 May 2005, 1:45:34 PM they sould but the airbusa380 a bomber and fill it with bomb and nukes
baritone89
Subject: Boeing 777 bomber?
Post ID# 597
Message Number 7Date Posted: 14 June 2005, 1:21:09 AM Problem is with all that would be fighter aircraft. the vulcans would be useless long range plus those things have a big @$$ radar cross section and give off heat like the sun. it's cool in theory put not really practical.
|