|
Subject - F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
[Topic ID# 68] | Messages 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
trerxt67
Subject: F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
Post ID# 431
Message Number 1Date Posted: 12 April 2005, 10:23:56 AM The F-16 defeated the Mirage III, in economy and technology terms.
baritone89
Subject: F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
Post ID# 562
Message Number 2Date Posted: 12 June 2005, 12:29:04 AM ain't that the truth. the mirage just can't turn as tight as the falcon. that's cuz of it's big delta wing. if u add so of those small wing things on the nose, it would be alot more manuverable.
baritone89
Subject: F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
Post ID# 577
Message Number 3Date Posted: 13 June 2005, 1:37:11 AM i was meaning canards.
f_14_tomcat
Subject: F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
Post ID# 735
Message Number 4Date Posted: 15 July 2005, 10:59:14 PM canard wings are all good but the reason for the delta wings is so it can cruise between mach1 and mach 1.2 with little change in flight characteristics
f_14_tomcat
Subject: F-16 vs. Mirage 2000, round 1 fight!
Post ID# 746
Message Number 5Date Posted: 17 July 2005, 7:49:37 PM also these wings allow instant responses in a dogfight or tight manuevres at mch speed or below it
|
|
|
|