<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
		<channel>
			<title>GAC Forum</title>
			<atom:link href="http://forum.globalaircraft.org/feed.pl?type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/</link>
			<description>The Global Aircraft Forum's most recent messages -- GlobalAircraft.org</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<language>en</language>	
			
			<item>
						<title>Edwards AFB X-47B [by: vipersx911]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2351</link>
						<description><![CDATA[   At the Air show last weekend at Edwards AFB they showed something that really caught my attention it was a plane they called the X-47B and it is the new Unmanned Air Superiority fighter for the US Navy. Thought it was very interesting to see they also had a model of the X-51 which they have scheduled to fly for the first time by the end of the year to my knowledge if anyone else knows more about these two please post.<br />]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2351</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>HyCAUSE [by: firstsgt_cap]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2206</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Can't say I have...I'll check into it.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2206</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>HyCAUSE [by: jetwhiz]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2202</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Has anyone heard anything about a more exact and official speed that the HyCAUSE managed to reach back in 2007?   <hr /> ~JetWhiz  <img src='http://www.globalaircraft.org/photos/jester.GIF' alt='jester' title='&amp;lt;8)' /><br /><br />Tuesday, March 31, 2009 -- 5:44:02 PM PDT]]></description>
						<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2202</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: f6hellcat]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2182</link>
						<description><![CDATA[good point.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2182</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: firstsgt_cap]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2181</link>
						<description><![CDATA[That makes no sense guys.<br /><br />When we first went into Iraq, as well as Afghanistan we used stealth aircraft with devistating results and no losess to us.<br /><br />With the current opposition it may not be needed all the time, however we must be prepared for China, Russia, Iran, or any other country that we may need to go to war with, it is most definetly a nessecary technology.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2181</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: v_bomber (harry)]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2140</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Yep <hr /> ...Sublime on the towers of my skiey bowers<br />Lightning, my pilot, sits;<br />In a cavern under is fettered the Thunder...]]></description>
						<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2140</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: f6hellcat]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2138</link>
						<description><![CDATA[I guess thats why all our lightwheght fighters are so useful right now, along with UAVs]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2138</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: v_bomber (harry)]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2136</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Good point as stealth was designed to take on U.S.S.R but after its collapse we've been fighting small countrys with small capabilitys (bar some) At this time stealth has kinda taken a backseat as supermanouverability is the forehead at the moment <hr /> ...Sublime on the towers of my skiey bowers<br />Lightning, my pilot, sits;<br />In a cavern under is fettered the Thunder...]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2136</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>Has stealth lost its "uummph"? [by: f6hellcat]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2133</link>
						<description><![CDATA[now I don't believe this, and it sorta just popped into my head:<br />so I was sitting here, looking around the forums and think "hmm... since stealth was created in the Cold War to fight Russia, and now we are just fighting bands of militents now, not any countries, with little if any radar abilities, has stealth become almost... (dare i say it.) useless?"<br /><br />just a thought. thought id throw it out there. personally, i don't believe it. It is still a very valueble thing to have. it just crossed my mind.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2133</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>which aircraft should replace the canadian CF-18? [by: examples (examples)]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2099</link>
						<description><![CDATA[F-35 definitely. ]]></description>
						<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2099</guid>
					</item>
					
		</channel>
		</rss>
	