<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
		<channel>
			<title>GAC Forum</title>
			<atom:link href="http://forum.globalaircraft.org/feed.pl?type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/</link>
			<description>The Global Aircraft Forum's most recent messages -- GlobalAircraft.org</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<language>en</language>	
			
			<item>
						<title>aim 9 or aa11 [by: firstsgt_cap]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2184</link>
						<description><![CDATA[I'm referring to them in general, there technology tends to be FUBAR in many ways.<br /><br />Anyway, the AA-11 is a fairly new missile, it has range on the sidewinder and apparently claims high off bore sight ability as well, so it is more in the AIM-132 category of ASRAAM's.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2184</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>aim 9 or aa11 [by: f6hellcat]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2153</link>
						<description><![CDATA[are you reffering to their Shkval torpedo?]]></description>
						<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2153</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>aim 9 or aa11 [by: firstsgt_cap]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2071</link>
						<description><![CDATA[AIM-9X, high off bore sight shots, great proven close range missile and its not Russian...........not to say that don't have some good technology, it just tends to be weird in some ways..............]]></description>
						<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2071</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>aim 9 or aa11 [by: f6hellcat]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2031</link>
						<description><![CDATA[first of all, great to see you back examples.<br /><br />second of all, i'd probebly go with the aa11 just because it sounds newer acourding to the document I read on it. of coarse I could be all wrong... (its happend before) <hr /> I reject your reality and substitute my own!<br />                              -Adam Savage (Mythbuster)]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2031</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>aim 9 or aa11 [by: examples (examples)]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2028</link>
						<description><![CDATA[aim9 or aa11 archer?]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=2028</guid>
					</item>
					
		</channel>
		</rss>
	