<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
		<channel>
			<title>GAC Forum</title>
			<atom:link href="http://forum.globalaircraft.org/feed.pl?type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/</link>
			<description>The Global Aircraft Forum's most recent messages -- GlobalAircraft.org</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<language>en</language>	
			
			<item>
						<title>best bomber ever made [by: v_bomber (harry)]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1655</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Vulcan not best but my favourite best though probably the tsr2 it got everything right and was the most adavanced bomber of its time it had all the stuff the tornado had in the 80s and even today in 1964. The only thing that stopped being the greatest bomber ever was socialism in 1965 the government scarpped it as prices were getting to high there are to left in the world one at the raf museum cosford and imperial war muesuem duxford and a suspisious nose at brooklands. (if you want to find out more visit my site www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk have a look youll be suprised what ive done but my iste is class in my eyes anyway) <hr /> Harrys the name hows lifes the catch phrase! <br />                                                 P.S. <br />After TSR2 i agree with you guys b52.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1655</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>best bomber ever made [by: piper_cadet]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1586</link>
						<description><![CDATA[Yea, same, the b-52 is the best.]]></description>
						<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1586</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>best bomber ever made [by: oxusaf]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1381</link>
						<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with the firstsgt, B-52, albeit the B-58 is cool it never did the job that the b-52 has done, and don't quote me on this but I do believe the b-52 has greater range, payload and obviously speed (jet vs. turbo prop). Also the b-52 will continue to serve for another 40 years, this is coming straight from ACC (Air Combat Command).
]]></description>
						<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1381</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>best bomber ever made [by: firstsgt_cap]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1380</link>
						<description><![CDATA[You have to think of it in different terms than how nice it looked because I bomber can look good, but be a real piece of sh*t, take the B-58 Hustler, cool but effectivly useless.<br><br>The all time greatest bomber has to be the B-52 I mean how long has it done its job and done it well?
]]></description>
						<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1380</guid>
					</item>
					<item>
						<title>best bomber ever made [by: troseman]</title>
						<link>http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1376</link>
						<description><![CDATA[i think the best bomber of all time would have to be the B-36 Peacemaker that thing was sick with 6 massive pusher engines.
]]></description>
						<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forum.globalaircraft.org/toolkit.pl?type=goToMsg&amp;msgid=1376</guid>
					</item>
					
		</channel>
		</rss>
	