Global Aircraft Forum Help -  Privacy Policy -  Interactive Content Guidelines -  Legal Notices
Global Aircraft Welcome, Guest!   [Log In]  |   [Sign Up]  |   [Return Home]  

GAC Forum

RSS Feed Message Directories
Create New Topic
   RSS Feed Community
   RSS Feed Subject - WWIII in 2006  [Topic ID# 46]Messages 1 - 10 of 20  

ghost_lead
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 210
Message Number 1
Date Posted: 05 November 2004, 3:44:54 PM

Ok, just so that everyone knows, this post has NOTHING to do with the Bible Code. NOTHING.

So, China said about a year or two back that if Taiwan makes any aggressive action towards independence, military action will be taken. A few months ago, Taiwan said that it was announcing plans for a referendum on independence in 2006. China have stated that they consider thiis to be aggressive action.

Now, the US have always supported Taiwan militarily, and, with Bush in office again, it's likely that they will get stuck into this. Japan have an age-old grudge with China so they may join in on Taiwan's side, although they're constitution is very pacifist so that's not certain. Russia will not sit back. They need to restrict the US's control so they will either help China, or, do as they did in WWII and go through China from the North to meet the US in the middle to make sure they don't get too far north. France will ally with China because they simply don't like Bush. UK will do what they do best, follow the US's &*#.

Anyone have any opinions on this? Think it's true? Think it's bull? Tell me what you think!



h2opolostud416
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 211
Message Number 2
Date Posted: 05 November 2004, 6:24:10 PM

I totally thinks thats true man, hopefully not to powerful of weapons will get everyone into another cold war though



mil35hokum
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 213
Message Number 3
Date Posted: 16 November 2004, 8:54:17 PM

lets change the senario a bit. BIN LADEN wont be sleeping his days away. A new anti-christ might rise in the middle east, turning it into world wide crusade threatning USA . USA attacks gulf ,gulf ynites under one banner, becoming anti-US. china being communist will ally with them . attack europe (far fetch ) but still.
russia assumes no ally stance as both US and China are wellnot exactly their type .world goes berserk. I would like to Qoute a line by Einstein- ' i know not weapons with which ww3 will be fought but i can tellyou ww4 will surely be fought with sticks and stones.'Copyright  The Global Aircraft Organization



Berkut
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 246
Message Number 4
Date Posted: 17 January 2005, 12:04:30 AM

I don't think we will have any kind cold or hot world war in next 10 years. U.S equivalent (Russia) in crisis. And U.S won't start any other war because of the Iraq. U.S got all troops in Iraq and it's not enouph. Half of Iraq contlols by Briitain's , Spain's,Poland's and Ukraine's peacekeepers. I don't see any other countryes that would have world war without U.S's , Russia' s interference.



su-37
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 253
Message Number 5
Date Posted: 17 January 2005, 4:37:12 PM

Only Russia and U.S. has long range missles and capabilitys to start nucle war. All other county's Just don't have space, or long range nucle missles, or even planes to carry that few thouthand pound atomic bomb.



Alex
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 303
Message Number 6
Date Posted: 25 January 2005, 4:19:46 PM

Do not trust everything that you read, Rumors have that China, Britian and france have the ability to get there nuclear weapons to their targets no matter how far away they are.

I reckon another place for war starting will be Korea. Honestly when you have half a million mean ready 24 hours a day everyday of the year ready to fight you got to wonder how long that cease fire can last.




su-37
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 310
Message Number 7
Date Posted: 26 January 2005, 5:42:17 PM

They just don't have enouph space to fight for that million army. Few months later Russain and Chinese presidents met to discuss theat from North Korea, I know Russia and China had contacts with N.K. for a long time, but when Russia and China became independent N.K stoped communicating with Russia nad China. So if war would starts, it wount be long before U.S. or any other country would destoy it without help of
Russia or China.



baritone89
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 608
Message Number 8
Date Posted: 14 June 2005, 1:49:24 AM

yeh n. korea might be ready but their about as equipped as the viet cong! We need a general Like George Patton. Someone to get in there, kick @$$, and secure the objective.



trigun5
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 649
Message Number 9
Date Posted: 16 June 2005, 5:05:39 AM

See what I don't get is how people always assume that every war is always going to go nuclear. Syria and Iran were supposed to allies with Iraq. But the US came into Iraq so quick that those two countries weren't quick enough to push the button before the US almost took over the country and then looked to those two and pretty much told them that if they try anything that they were going to be two newest Glass factories. I don't think that N. Korea will have much of a chance if a war does start, but with two bases full of F-16s in south korea 3 or 4 bases in Japan and okinawa full of 15's, 16s, and other aircraft to support them, as well as the two bases in Alaska, a guard unit in hawaii. I mean the us has the globe pretty much covered to the point that. It doesn't matter who 'sneezes' we will be there to take care of the situation in no time. If it is beneficiary to The US. Countries only used get involved in someone elses war if it is beneficiary to them. not just because they can.
James Porter



baritone89
Subject: WWIII in 2006
Post ID# 665
Message Number 10
Date Posted: 18 June 2005, 11:22:16 PM

There hasn't been a nuke fired in anger since nagasaki!


   of 2 pages )   [Next]   Last >>


Search the forum:



You must be logged in to post on this forum! Please Log in now




Global Aircraft Forum and faces are
Copyright © 2018 The Global Aircraft Organization

GAC Forum v.1,7,2